There is no evidence so far that vaccines are reducing infections from the fast-spreading variant.
By Luc Montagnier and Jed RubenfeldJan. 9, 2022 5:20 pm ETPRINTTEXT897
Listen to articleLength7 minutes
Federal courts considering the Biden administration’s vaccination mandates—including the Supreme Court at Friday’s oral argument—have focused on administrative-law issues. The decrees raise constitutional issues as well. But there’s a simpler reason the justices should stay these mandates: the rise of the Omicron variant.
It would be irrational, legally indefensible and contrary to the public interest for government to mandate vaccines absent any evidence that the vaccines are effective in stopping the spread of the pathogen they target. Yet that’s exactly what’s happening here.
Unorthodox Truth 