Date: 8 December 2021
Comments: 3

Nearly a year since the mass rollout of covid jabs begun, we re-appraise what we do and don’t know about the covid jabs

Content Sections

• ●Topline
• ●Freedom on trial
• ●Why the covid-19 jabs shouldn’t be described as ‘vaccines’
• ●What might be in the vials that isn’t declared?
• ●What should be in the vials?
• ●Do the ‘vaccines’ contain nanotechnology?
• ●It’s a pandemic of the unvaccinated, right?
• ●Omicron update
• ●Final word

By Rob Verkerk PhD; founder, scientific and executive director

Topline

• Omicron is being used by governments and health authorities to mandate or coerce ever more people into receiving covid-19 jabs
• It is imperative that sufficient information is given to potential vaccinees to allow properly informed consent. This article reviews key information that is not widely reported by governments, health authorities, vaccinators, the mainstream medical profession or the mass media
• Given that the most commonly used covid-19 jabs rely on providing genetic information to the body to force it to produce a modified form of the spike protein, the jabs should not be represented as ‘vaccines’
• The mRNA jabs rely on genetic material that is significantly altered to generate mutant spike proteins that retain their prefusion conformity even after they get into cells. The lipid nanoparticles have not been adequately studied for their safety.
• The viral vector jabs by AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson rely on human foetal cell lines and the majority of the protein in the jabs may be from this source, rather than from the viral vectors themselves
• The spike protein is toxic in its own right and may induce adverse effects on the body whether it is generated from genetic information from jabs or from naturally-acquired infection
• Contaminants, deliberate or accidental, have been found in many vial specimens
• There are no substantive data to justify the ‘safe and effective’ claims often made for covid-19 jabs, especially not in the face of omicron
• Covid-19 jabs, especially if given repeatedly every few months, will likely cause lasting negative impacts on immune system function so increasing the risk of a wide range of other diseases while increasing risks of adverse reactions
• Clear evidence has emerged that data used for ‘vaccine surveillance’ by the UK Health Security Agency (formerly Public Health England) has been accidentally or deliberately misrepresented to infer outcomes among the jabbed are better than for those who decline
• There is little or no evidence that informed consent is being, or has been, offered at any time during the ‘pandemic’.

https://www.anhinternational.org/news/what-s-in-the-jabs-they-re-so-desperate-to-give-us/