By Kurt Cobb, originally published by Resource Insights January 15, 2023

UT NOTE: So-called “climate science” that made a name for itself by declaring a “consensus” of “scientists” who believed that “anthropogenic global waarming”, a hypothethis based soledly on “models” and data susceptible to manipulation by believers trying to make reality fit those models, has suffered the loss of its credibility much like the sciences of virology, medical science and public health as a result of the fraudulent science that launched and controlled CV-19. The attemtpt to censure the sceptics in both cases — science is dependent on sceptism to remain scientific — has along with the exposure of incentivized fraudulent behavior, is forcing a rethinking of climate reality in the face of so much chaos. Science that lacks integrity merely gets in the way of meaningful efforts to decentralize and loclaize the energy and political power structures so that communities can prepare for the complexities of an uncertain future free of the self-serving values of both federal and corporate leadership.