We’ve gone from “two mRNA jabs will ensure you won’t carry the virus or get sick or die of COVID” to “you need a booster every four months and you can still contract, transmit, get sick and die of COVID.” At this rate, we’re looking at three injections per year, and the fully-jabbed and boosted are still getting sick with COVID.
Link copied

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the Day. It’s free.
Story at-a-glance:
- A preprint study posted April 3 reports high rates of infection with BA.1, BA.1.1 and BA.2 — variants of Omicron — among triple-jabbed health care workers. In all, the incidence rate among the triple-jabbed with one of these variants was 22%, and only 10% remained asymptomatic.
- March 29 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized a second booster (dose No. 4, for those taking Pfizer or Moderna) for adults over age 50, as well as a third booster (dose No. 5) for immunocompromised people aged 12 and older. The additional boosters are to be given four months after the last dose.
- The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is also recommending adults who have received two doses of Janssen’s viral vector DNA shot to get a third shot using either Pfizer or Moderna, despite there being no data on the safety or effectiveness of mixing the various shots.
- FDA authorized doses 4 and 5, without input from its expert voting panel, based on data showing the Moderna shot was only 11% effective and caused side effects in 40% of recipients, and the Pfizer shot was 30% effective and caused side effects in 80% of people.
- The lead author of that paper, Dr. Gili Regev-Yochay, an infectious disease specialist at Sheba Medical Center in Tel HaShomer, Israel, has publicly stated that “Not a third dose, not a fourth dose, not a fifth dose will do anything to stop infections [long-term].”
… “working”as far as what?
Protecting people was never the actual plan.
The vaccines are “working”, just not the way people were told.
The quickest “cure” (not cure) role out in the history of mankind, and “the people” fell for it.
I continue clinging to the suspicion that scientists, academic scientists, docs etc are conservative n their relationships with media, political discourse, etc. Perhaps careful is a better descriptor. As a result, they were very slow to say anything nonscientific until the attacks turned obviously anti-sceience and they saw what was happening to the real scientifically honest colleagues. They are still being slow like science is slow. I attribute much of the growth of the Resistance among professionals to RFK Jrs courage and persistence.