I think it’s important for you all to read this paper and pass it on.
UT NOTE: This post includes a comment by Margaret Anna Alice, a substack writer, who has been researching graphene oxide/hydroxide for a future article. Her comment is a lengthy list of links to studies and articles about graphene being used for medical interventions. Click the LINK and you will find more links by others researching graphene.
I watched a video lately about this graphene oxide hypothesis that provided a link to recently published paper entitled: “A Novel Graphene Quantum Dot-Based mRNA Delivery Platform” published in July 2021 in the journal ChemistryOpen. I will leave it up to you to confirm what page it begins on.1 (I simply can’t believe this is our reality.)
Just to be clear, I have no opinions formed on this subject yet. I rarely, if ever, jump to conclusions prematurely (as par for my own course), but when I see evidence that is irrefutably odd – be it in-and-of-itself or timing – I can’t look away. These non-look-away moments help me to form my conclusions. And I am very suspicious now that there might be more than meets the eye to this subject.
Here is what they say in the Abstract:
During the last decades, there has been growing interest in using therapeutic messager RNA (mRNA) together with drug delivery systems. Naked, unformulated mRNA is, however, unable to cross the cell membrane and is susceptible to degradation. Here we use graphene quantum dots (GQDs) functionalized with polyethyleneimine (PEI) as a novel mRNA delivery system. Our results show that these modified GQDs can be used to deliver intact and functional mRNA to Huh-7 hepatocarcinoma cells at low doses and, that the GQDs are not toxic, although cellular toxicity is a problem for these first generation modified particles. Functionalized GQDs represent a potentially interesting delivery system that is easy to manufacture, stable and effective.
Did you see it? They claim – in the abstract! – that the GQDs are not toxic but that they are also toxic to cells (Reactive Oxygen Species generation and lysosome damage to name a couple of ways). Psst, guys, if it’s toxic to cells, it’s toxic. Like cationic lipids. You can read more about cellular toxicity2 associated with this type of technology here.
The video is here if you want to watch it.
Liu Y, Zhao C, Sabirsh A, Ye L, Wu X, Lu H, Liu J. A Novel Graphene Quantum Dot-Based mRNA Delivery Platform. ChemistryOpen. 2021 Jul;10(7):666-671. doi: 10.1002/open.202000200. Epub 2021 Apr 7. PMID: 33829677; PMCID: PMC8248920.
Yuan X, Zhang X, Sun L, Wei Y, Wei X. Cellular Toxicity and Immunological Effects of Carbon-based Nanomaterials. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2019 Apr 11;16(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12989-019-0299-z. PMID: 30975174; PMCID: PMC6460856.
Subscribe to Unacceptable Jessica
By Jessica Rose · Hundreds of paid subscribers
Jessica’s Substack Input
|Margaret Anna AliceWrites Margaret Anna Alice Through the… ·4 hr ago·edited 4 hr agoI have been researching the graphene oxide/hydroxide issue for around a year now. I plan to write about this eventually, but here are some of the links I’ve gathered that may be useful for further investigations:• “Independent analysis of SARS-CoV-2 vials” (with Dr. Tess Lawrie)https://rumble.com/vvmxug-independent-analysis-of-pfizer-vials.html• “Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant” (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32531395/)• “Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity” (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26814441/)• “Nano coronavirus recombinant vaccine taking graphene oxide as carrier” (https://patents.google.com/patent/CN112220919A/en)• “American Scientists Confirm Toxic Graphene Oxide, and More, in Covid Injections” (https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/09/02/american-scientists-confirm-toxic-graphene-oxide-and-more-in-covid-injections/)• “What’s in the Vials? A Conversation with a Team in New Zealand About Mystery Objects They Found” (https://tessa.substack.com/p/mystery-objects)• “Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms” (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088662/)• “Graphene Oxide Conjugated Magnetic Beads for RNA Extraction” (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asia.201700554)• “Why Graphene Oxide in mRNA vaccines isn’t such a wild conspiracy theory” (https://moondiamond.substack.com/p/why-graphene-oxide-in-mrna-vaccines?s=r)And then, of course, most people are likely familiar with the viral graphene razor blades video Dr. Andreas Noack made shortly before his mysterious death:• https://odysee.com/@%C3%89breszt-%C5%90k:0/GRAPHENE–RAZOR-BLADES-FOUND-IN-THE-COVID-BIO-WEAPON-DR-ANDREAS-NOACK:1It was based on this report by Dr. Pablo Campra:• https://www.medicdebate.org/files/FINAL_VERSION_CAMPRA_REPORT_DETECTION_OF_GRAPHENE_IN_COVID19_VACCINES.report.pdfAnd this is the video Noack’s girlfriend posted explaining the circumstances of his death, which she believes was caused by a directed energy weapon (DEW), combined with potential hospicide by intubation:• https://tokentube.net/v/3591942516/DR–ANDREAS-NOACK–R-I-P—WHISTLEBLOWER-HERO—DEATH-CIRCUMSTANCES-Update-by-his-girlfriend-ANNAExpand full comment39Reply|