from The Vaccine Reaction / National Vaccine Information Center June 22, 2021
NOTE: One of the telltale signs that CV-19 is not what Dr Fauci, the CDC, WHO, you name it, have been promoting as “science” is the way that “cases” have been exaggerated by changes in the definition of “cases” as well as the under-regulated and, consequently, undisciplined use of the PCR test, which itself is not a diagnostic tool, tho it is being used as one. There are other red flags, of course, not the least of which is the incredible surge in censorship as the public unwittingly submits to what they believe is fact, tho their trust and obedience are based solely on hearsay. Without censorship, the whole scheme would have died on the vine 12 months ago and hundreds of thousands of people’s lives could have been saved.
~~> CDC Changes How It Counts “Breakthrough Cases” and Lowers Cycle Threshold for PCR Tests <~~
Sometime between mid- to late-April, the CDC issued new guidance titled “COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Case Investigation and Reporting.” The guidance was intended to notify the public that during the “coming weeks,” the CDC would “transition from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases (cases of fully vaccinated people coming down with COVID-19) to focus on identifying and investigating only vaccine breakthrough infections that resulted in hospitalization or death.” Health officials said the “shift” would ” help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance.”9 10
The guidance also notified laboratories that, in conducting RT-PCR (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) tests, they should reduce the magnification cycle threshold (CT) for detecting the SARS-CoV-2 virus to 28 or less, as opposed to the internationally accepted cut-off for CT value of between 35-40. According to the guidance, “Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28.”
The CT refers to the number of times a sample is amplified by a PCR machine, or thermocycler, to get a result. By reducing the magnification threshold, many people who may have tested positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus under higher magnification thresholds would now test negative.11 12 13 14
It has been estimated, for example, that up to 90 percent of people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at a CT of 40 would have tested negative had the CT been reduced to 30.15
Find the full article here