Predictably Random Observations: Episode 5

~~> Informed Consent?

Judging from the lack of awareness of all that surrounds the mass vaccination of high risk people in this senior apartment complex where perhaps 45 of the 50 residents have enthusiastically been poked, jabbed and otherwise submitted to the as yet unapproved vaccine experiment, I think it is safe to say that tho they all consented, none of them were truly informed. More like they gave their uninformed consent, which is to say they were not informed about the medical risks nor were they informed about the fact that the vaccines are not approved because the required safety tests have not yet been completed.

When a “friend” accused me of putting people at risk if I didnt vaccinate — How are you going to feel when you infect someone who dies? — it became clear, then, that our relationship was doomed. His ignorance about these new vaccines and vaccine science, in general, not to mention the emerging evidence that people who have been vaccinated are somehow transmitting (not in the usual way of “shedding”) the disease to others ….

~~> New risk to the unvaccinated?

One thing that is perfectly clear is that we, collectively, scientists included, know so little about the alleged “virus” and even less about the “vaccines” which are only labeled as vaccines because the definition of vaccine was changed much like the definition of “case” has been changed as part of the Covid-19 fiasco.These vaccines do not protect from future infection, a liability that is being obfuscated by claims of so many new more lethal variants that may (or may not) be caused by the vaccines “training” the bodies of the vaccinated to manufacture the disease “spike protein” to trigger the immune system response.

In effect, vaccinated people are genetically modified covid vaccine manufacturers that attack anything in their bodies that have the spike. And once their modified immune responses have destroyed the “infected” cells, the body sheds the junk leftovers via breath, sweat, urine, and shit.

Important to note that the same genetic waste generated by the novel vaccine response will test positive to the PCR test. Hmm

~~> Censorship

The people who are being vaccinated do not know that their limited awareness and knowledge of this pandemic is due to censorship. The censorship is so effective that they are only aware that there is controversy in terms of so-called “vaccine hesitancy” that is being promoted, reports mainstream media, by anti-vax conspiracy theorists.

They do not know that those vaccine-hesitant are armed with way more transparent science than the vaccine manufacturers and pushers can defend themselves against. So, rather than debate the science and data, they gaslight to protect the illusion and denial that makes their marketing strategies so effective.

Censorship is the most profound give-away that this pandemic is not what Fauci, Gates and their BigPharma allies are making it out to be. Eminent scientists are being censored from exposing the fallacies embedded in the official CV-19 storyline

~~> Plausible Deniability

During the Viet Nam War, new verbage was born that helped detract from the reality of US aggression. The big one, for me, was “de-escalation”. It reminded me of the Snickers (and all other capitalist commodities) price escalation strategy. Make the candy bar smaller, raise the price, and put it on sale. When the US “de-escalated” it meant that the invasion of that sovereign nation was returning to its more usual level of violence and mayhem.

During the SARS-CoV-2 War, one chunk of verbage that gets stuck in my craw is “plausible deniability”. The official orthodox narrative / storyline about Covid-19 is built around this idea that whatever they say and do, the powers-that-be always have a way to cover their asses by denying they knew or did something that was their fault.

Being protected from liability is one thing, but assuring big sales is dependent on controlling the narrative.

Censorship is the primary tool for controlling the narrative / sales con. And plausible deniability is another layer of defense against the scientific hoards determined to overthrow the fraud.

~~> The War between Germ and Terrain Theories of Health

At some point, perhaps too late, the edifice of Germ Theory in medical science will crumble under the weight of its virus-centered anti-science. Without germ theory, authoritarian regimes will lose perhaps the most effective way to control their masses. The threat to germ theory comes from the more holistic Terrain Theory which is built upon the notion that the human body knows how to protect and repair itself if and when medicine does not inappropriately intervene. The inner terrain and the outer terrain / environment are enmeshed. Healthy environment and healthy bodymind are inseparable. Nutrition and exercise are the key ingredients of promoting and maintaining a healthy internal terrain in which all systems are fully functional.

About michael burgwin

A child of the peace and antiWar movements, a Truther with self-diagnosed Opposition Defiance Disorder, formerly politically liberal tho now politically marooned, and Post-Doomer, on any issue, I trend to the conspiracy side, sort through the absurd, fantastical and insane, until I find firm ground usually located just the other side of the censorship firewall of propaganda and orthodoxy, dogma, and other either / or thinking.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s